New Review Over 15 Months Old

[Libertine]

this new Asian Coco review by Rubrub that posted today is over 15 months old from March 5, 2016. I know for certain that Coco said she moved to Denver last year and she has been working there.


http://www.mpreviews.com/review_read...=master_review


do you think there should be a specific time limit for posting new reviews, such as nothing older than 30 days ?

[RoyalCrown]

I remember Coco. Tiny Tits, more like raisins on an ironing board. But she could hoover with the best.

[deezguy]

There should definitely be a time limit. Information from these posts is timely. Even if a provider is still at the same location, what was offered, in a session a year ago, may be far different from what is offered in a, session today.

[e350skl]

Under the present guidelines for submitting reviews, guideline No.5 provides that no review be more than 30 days old.

[dupree]

There is no quality control of the review content of this site.

[Redfish]

Asian Coco is one crazy lady. She swallows IME. Hmmm Review away. Fly to Denver and get some of that. Seriously, Coco is a NUT. Talks and talks and talk. Best way to shut her up is to put junior down her throat and hold her head. See my TER review of her. Priceless.

[rocketrick]

Originally Posted by dupree

There is no quality control of the review content of this site.

They do look at reviews. One of my recent ones was sent back for being too short. Even though there were shorter ones that passed through. Maybe there is more than one person doing the reviews. just not consistent

[dupree]

Originally Posted by rocketrick

They do look at reviews. One of my recent ones was sent back for being too short. Even though there were shorter ones that passed through. Maybe there is more than one person doing the reviews. just not consistent

You can copy/paste a review, word-for-word, for the same provider and it gets passed through. Yesterday there was a review in which the guy said he showed up, found that the door was locked, and so he promptly left.

How many times do you see a review where the reviewer is too lazy to start a new review and attaches the review for girl X onto the pre-existing review for girl Y.

Maybe you're right. Maybe every now and then, someone reads the reviews before allowing them. But there's so much obvious garbage in/garbage out.

[rocketrick]

Originally Posted by dupree

You can copy/paste a review, word-for-word, for the same provider and it gets passed through. Yesterday there was a review in which the guy said he showed up, found that the door was locked, and so he promptly left.

How many times do you see a review where the reviewer is too lazy to start a new review and attaches the review for girl X onto the pre-existing review for girl Y.

Maybe you're right. Maybe every now and then, someone reads the reviews before allowing them. But there's so much obvious garbage in/garbage out.

I'm going to amend my previous comment. Just looked at a review.

http://www.mpreviews.com/p/Haylee-Es...452-84630.html

It has a picture that is flagged as accurate. Problem is the data for this provider says the hair is black and "way long" to me that is more than mid back probably waist length. Picture shows it barely making it to her tits and a beautiful red.

Which is correct. The oldest review is 4 months old. She could have cut and dyed. maybe accurate at one time but not up to date. Maybe the picture wasn't really accurate.

[Libertine]

what do you think about 4 to 6 reviews of the same provider June at the same exact place Thai Massage in Escondido by the same reviewer in a span of only 3 months with back-to back reviews ?

http://www.mpreviews.com/reviews_det...views_id=82627