commented on obvious fake review, not posted - Massage Parlor Reviews Forum

Richard Boinkwell · #1 May 23rd, 2016

I hate to complain, again, but really this is not how this site should be run. A guy posts a review, his very first one, of a girl who has dozens of reviews which say all you get is a hj, and sometimes not even that, and he is claiming he got fs and she was anxious to do it. I questioned the veracity of the review in the comments section, but MPR will not post my comment. It's Linda at Moonlight Gardens in San Diego, btw. Well, I guess others can read all the reviews and reach the same conclusion, but we ought to be able to point out these obvious fraudsters.

asiansam · #2 May 23rd, 2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Boinkwell

I hate to complain, again, but really this is not how this site should be run. A guy posts a review, his very first one, of a girl who has dozens of reviews which say all you get is a hj, and sometimes not even that, and he is claiming he got fs and she was anxious to do it. I questioned the veracity of the review in the comments section, but MPR will not post my comment. It's Linda at Moonlight Gardens in San Diego, btw. Well, I guess others can read all the reviews and reach the same conclusion, but we ought to be able to point out these obvious fraudsters.

A few of my review comments have been posted over the years, but not many. They were all on topic and not abusive. It seems approving/posting review comments are a low priority here, and have been for a while. Voting buttons at least would be a great idea. You know, Good, Informative, Funny, Fake, etc.

OkiOpai · #3 May 26th, 2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by asiansam

A few of my review comments have been posted over the years, but not many. They were all on topic and not abusive. It seems approving/posting review comments are a low priority here, and have been for a while. Voting buttons at least would be a great idea. You know, Good, Informative, Funny, Fake, etc.

I have always thought that members should be rated for credibility based on their reviews. Reviews could be rated for credibility which would effect the reviewer's credibility rating. Those credibility ratings could be used for form an overall credibility/reputation score for each member, and in turn used to weigh averages for provider reviews. Just a thought...

NicetoKnow · #4 May 27th, 2016

Quote:

Originally Posted by OkiOpai

I have always thought that members should be rated for credibility based on their reviews. Reviews could be rated for credibility which would effect the reviewer's credibility rating. Those credibility ratings could be used for form an overall credibility/reputation score for each member, and in turn used to weigh averages for provider reviews. Just a thought...

Yep!......