#11
|
|||
|
|||
Well written post. Thanks for sharing your experiences.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I was on there, on and off for 5 months late last year and earlier this year, had plenty of money and time on my hands, worked it as hard as I could. I was not interested in MILFs, just the young cute ones. Bitches I was interested in wouldn't reply. I got zilch. Cut my losses.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I can confirm all the ones who have a decent level of looks want $500 or more and other junk paid for. Yet they are always bubbling up at the top of searches waiting for their payday. I'm even a half decent looking guy who can communicate, this last round I've been working it for 6 weeks now and not a single conversion. Lots of contacts and communication, lots of phone numbers, no meets except for the one that I feel no interest to see again. The guy who owns and runs the site is making bank on it, but he's a total shit at making the site useful from a guy's perspective.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I'm considering growing a moustache and buying a t-shirt.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
HELP! That one went way over this salt 'n pepper head. I gotta get out from under that rock more often!
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Update after a week of continued effort: 1 more possible meet but still on the high range. A big problem with these girls is they always drop last minute shit on you like needing an Uber or schedule keeps adjusting. The drama factor makes this more junk. I get that maybe the white girls on the site are going to be this way, but it is way worse than when I was finding UTR girls who were almost all always happy with 200 and never looking at the clock and no drama.
I have looked at the Asian options on SA and honestly they don't seem much better than the white girls. No idea how MPKid turns any over within range, Kid I can only imagine you must not go for the lookers. I keep my settings on "slender" with an age range under 33, but mostly under 29. I think SA should be left to the rich cats. Anyone willing to for over 500 per meet for drama queens who want to also get other perks, it's a great option. If you get any replies. I don't know what most men are doing on this site to inflate these girls' egos but it's moronic. Last edited by Obsessive; July 15th, 2018 at 12:53 PM. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It's a numbers game. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I went ahead and met up with the 2nd option for 250. Her profile said she didn't smoke but first thing when she got here & after we were done was desperately seek a smoke. It was downhill from there. Mechanical, rushed, fake. I had to think of baseball to actually cum. "For it's one, two, three strikes, you're out, At the old ball game......" Couldn't wait for her to leave so I could watch NetFlix and pretend I'm gay.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I'm calling it now, SA and all the other sites they own will be imploding soon. They seem to have gotten aggressive this past week deleting members immediately for mere mention of any hooker-like words (like per-meet, rate, hour). They (their staff) will read private mailboxes when those words get flagged and then delete the account and sometimes leave a message to the other member that they were not escorts and were no longer going to respond. Right, sure. SA will not delete the male members ($$) but will delete the female accounts. Their "no prostitution" messaging is also getting bolded and more prominent on other sites they own. It seems like a sign they are getting pressures from LE. If you do use the site, be non-specific and take communications off the site. Which might work if the women there actually replied more often with phone numbers instead of short & useless replies once every 3 days.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|