|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
All Cops Are Internet Cops
LOL. having an offshore server for your website doesn't give you immunity. the FBI and DOJ have successfully indicted, arrested, prosecuted, seized assets, and imprisoned numerous individuals for various federal crimes that had their servers located outside of the U.S.
the Feds also did this to people that were foreign nationals. this will happen when any site takes credit cards, paypal, and other U.S. payment methods they are under U.S. jurisdiction no matter where the site is hosted. even if the site's servers are located totally offshore, if only one of the site's payments passes through a correspondent bank, any USD (United States Dollar) currency transaction usually involves a Standard Charter correspondent bank, the Feds can use that one transaction to bust the site's owners. Backpage uses Bitcoin the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the FBI took down RentBoy, The Review Board, MyRedBook, and SFRedBook adult oriented websites are also prosecuted using the federal statutes, The Travel Act and Money Laundering The Federal Travel Act is used by the Feds to step in to enforce state laws. Homeland Security raided Eros.com in November 2017. All Cops Are Internet Cops every single federal agency you can think of, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), ICE, NSA, FBI, DOJ, Postal Inspectors, DEA, and many more, including all local and state law enforcement agencies, investigate online crimes. 
|
|
#12
March 4th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
March 4th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
March 4th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
March 5th, 2018
|
||||
|
||||
107 Year Old Federal Law To Be Used To Shut Down Provider Content Websites
This Is A Bogus War On Internet Sex Work By The U.S. Congress
H.R. 1865 - FOSTA 2.0 - Republican Representative Bob Goodlatte rewrote the U.S. House Sex Trafficking Bill to Target All Prostitution A 107 Year Old Federal Law Is Going To Be Used To Shut Down Provider Content Websites The Mann Act - Read how a 107 year old law is suddenly relevant to online sex workers Goodlatte’s FOSTA 2.0 amended the Mann Act, which Congress passed in 1910 during a national panic over a mythical scourge of “white slavery.” The Mann Act makes it illegal to transport any person over state lines for purposes of prostitution. Goodlatte’s bill makes it illegal for "anyone who uses or operates, or even attempts to use or operate" — “a means of interstate or foreign commerce” — such as a website — “with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person.” A judge could sentence a guilty party to up to ten years in prison for this offense. That same judge could tack on an additional fifteen years for aggravating factors, such as promoting or facilitating the prostitution of five or more persons, or if the perpetrator acted “in reckless disregard of the fact such conduct contributed to sex trafficking.” This bill carves out an exception for jurisdictions where brothels legally operate. Goodlatte’s marked-up FOSTA 2.0 weakened and undermined Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA). Websites that “unlawfully promote and facilitate prostitution and contribute to sex trafficking" will now be prosecuted. Last week, the U.S. House Judiciary Committee approved Chairman Bob Goodlatte's FOSTA 2.0 amendment which expands the bill's focus from internet sex trafficking to all forms of online prostitution. Read the remarks below from U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Republican Bob Goodlatte (Va.) that he gave during the House Judiciary Committee’s markup of H.R. 1865, the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017 (FOSTA 2.0) that was passed in the House last week by a vote of 388 to 25. Republican Chairman Bob Goodlatte - "This bill provides federal, state, and local prosecutors the tools needed to combat online prostitution and sex trafficking. In the past few years, we’ve seen online prostitution and sex trafficking continue to grow at an alarming rate. Despite great efforts by law enforcement, young children and women are being advertised online brazenly for sex trafficking. Despite the fact prostitution is nearly universally illegal in the United States, online prostitution markets operate with virtual impunity. These markets provide an unregulated venue where sex trafficking flourishes. It is no secret that these platforms sell women and children like chattel – to profit off of their misery, over and over again. The websites providing these platforms, without any regard for the victims being sold on it, must be held accountable. Backpage.com is the most recognized name among these websites, and Backpage will certainly be held accountable. Congress cannot be tasked with investigating every website involved in operating these markets. We must ensure law enforcement has the tools to investigate and prosecute these websites, so that these bad-actor websites are punished criminally and to unearth facts which may be pled in civil suits. There are difficulties in prosecuting websites like Backpage for knowing facilitation of prostitution and sex trafficking. A very effective approach in combating these websites is to charge them with the facilitation and promotion of prostitution. H.R. 1865 makes it a crime to use an interstate facility with the intent to promote or facilitate prostitution. The connection between prostitution and sex trafficking is undeniable. 89 percent of women involved in prostitution want to escape. Prostitution is inherently harmful and dehumanizing and fuels sex trafficking. H.R. 1865 provides an enhanced punishment for websites that promote prostitution, in reckless disregard of the fact that people are being trafficked on their platforms. We also must ensure that local and state governments are able to use these tools, as many of the flourishing websites are regional. These websites are also too numerous to place these prosecutions solely in the hands of federal prosecutors. H.R. 1865 makes explicit that state criminal laws which punish the same conduct underlying this new federal crime may be enforced without running afoul of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). The bill also explicitly permits state criminal laws to be enforced which punish the same conduct underlying the federal sex trafficking statute, in the event any local prosecutor may find it useful." - Republican Chairman Bob Goodlatte Congress Delivered A Big Win For Internet Censorship Dark Days are ahead for adult oriented online communities Section 230 Of The Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) Has Been Gutted The U.S. Senate’s online sex-trafficking bill, the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017 (SESTA), created a broader standard of scienter for the federal sex-trafficking statute. Scienter is a legal term that refers to the level of knowledge of wrongdoing necessary for someone to be guilty of a crime. SESTA defines “participation in a venture” as “knowingly assisting, supporting or facilitating” a sex-trafficking violation. If a website were to remove some offensive material, a prosecutor could use that act as evidence of knowledge of wrongdoing. Before being undermined, Section 230 use to immunize interactive websites against liability for content posted by its users. That created a “safe harbor” for website administrators to remove offensive material without fear that such an act might be used in court as evidence of “knowledge” that a crime has been committed. Before being severely weakened, Section 230 would have protected web platforms and publishers from liability for the criminal conduct of their site users. FOSTA 2.0 was also amended to include SESTA FOSTA 2.0 makes "promoting prostitution" a federal crime, holds websites legally liable for user-posted content, and lets states retroactively prosecute offenders. FOSTA 2.0 targets website platforms that allow user-generated content as well as adults consensually engaging in prostitution with sex workers. FOSTA 2.0 explicitly criminalizes whoever "uses or operates" a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce or attempts to do so with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person. FOSTA 2.0 guts Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), which protected online platforms from being held liable for the speech of their users. FOSTA 2.0 makes possible civil suits brought by state Attorneys General targeting advertisers on websites that enable communication about sex work.
|
|
#16
March 5th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
I remember back in my early days mongering in the late 90's I used to just look in the back of the LA Weekly and find Asian massage parlor ads. They didn't need to be suggestive either for me to know I could have lots of fun there. All they needed to have was the 2 magic words: "Table Shower" and I knew it was my type of place
 . I remember the anticipation, excitement, even butterflies in my stomach, when a new AMP would pop up in Inglewood or WeHo, it was so exciting to get a new batch of providers to pick from!Cat & Mouse game, that's all it is. We'll just go back to massage parlors advertising nothing more than a massage + table shower for me to know where to go!
|
|
#17
March 5th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess future reviews are going to start with: "I had this dream"...................."then I woke up".
I figured every review was based on mongers dreams and that was understood. That's why I didn't feel it was necessary to point that out in all of my past reviews. I mean you really think some guy is partying with chicks that have no holds barred sex with dogs. The truth is the guy is in my bible study group and is a great story teller.
|
|
#18
March 5th, 2018
|
||||
|
||||
|
claiming to LE your reviews are just fantasy or only a product of your dreams. LOL. ads for getting a massage at a store with table showers from FOB young chicks. now that ruse will absolutely fool the shit out of them. all cops on the sex-trafficking task force unit are stupid, right ? haha
tell those groundbreaking ideas to the dozens of guys that only wrote their provider reviews for The Review Board (TRB). all of them were charged with felonies by the FBI and King County LE. just for writing and posting only reviews, they were all arrested for promoting and facilitating prostitution. And that was back in 2016 using the criminal laws on the books at that time before these two new Federal statutes existed, FOSTA 2.0 and SESTA. read below one written court statement by a defendant, signed under penalty of perjury, that he had to submit to the judge for his plea agreement with LE. Last edited by Drukpa Kunley; May 5th, 2022 at 08:22 PM.
|
|
#19
March 5th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
They held his arm behind his back with his head flat on the table until he signed it under duress, right? He wasn't packing many brain cells and where was his atty? They kept screaming at him "You're next Fucker" after giving him a tour of the jail? They told him he would get xxx months and xxx fine? His atty approved the statement? How would he know what effect what he admitted to would have in advance?
|
|
#20
March 6th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
https://projects.seattletimes.com/20...titution-bust/
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
