Lily Yan has over 200 reviews

[drpleasure]

Maybe Lily Yin should've gotten a Granny Award at the Staple Center the other night.

[beejay4me]

Betty from urban in Whittier is well over the century mark now

[Lector]

Betty? She's a gem!

[dupree]

Explain to me again why we want to have a limit of three reviews per provider?

I still contend it's a bad idea.

[chanceforester]

Originally Posted by dupree

Explain to me again why we want to have a limit of three reviews per provider?

I still contend it's a bad idea.

I kind of agree, but for example with Lily, "Steve" has review after review, which doesn't bother me, but I think MPR wants to tone that back. I mean, if I understand, it's 3 reviews from a monger per provider. I guess if it's been six months or so and you give an update, that's cool....

It's only ten days per review, but I've seen some BS reviews (as we all have), especially for providers that are long gone from that shop...that's just lame. I know money is tight, but I think there are some that take advantage of it. It is a business after all, and we are lucky to have a cool site like this. I started out nearly ten years ago with ********. It was good for a long time, but just went flat. I'm not sure why. That's when I came here. The good thing is that fellow mongers call BS on fake or ridiculously repetitive reviews....never mind the "I butt fucked her" threads!

[dupree]

Originally Posted by chanceforester

I kind of agree, but for example with Lily, "Steve" has review after review, which doesn't bother me, but I think MPR wants to tone that back. I mean, if I understand, it's 3 reviews from a monger per provider. I guess if it's been six months or so and you give an update, that's cool....

It's only ten days per review, but I've seen some BS reviews (as we all have), especially for providers that are long gone from that shop...that's just lame. I know money is tight, but I think there are some that take advantage of it. It is a business after all, and we are lucky to have a cool site like this. I started out nearly ten years ago with ********. It was good for a long time, but just went flat. I'm not sure why. That's when I came here. The good thing is that fellow mongers call BS on fake or ridiculously repetitive reviews....never mind the "I butt fucked her" threads!

The thing is, those guys who write BS reviews for their ten day aren't prevented from continuing to write BS reviews. I guarantee that the number of bogus reviews won't decrease with this limitation.

But this will cause the three following problems, all worse in my opinion:
1. The guys who write BS reviews will simply write them for girls who have less than 3 reviews, meaning a larger sample set of that girl's info will be useless.
2. Guys will simply fabricate girls altogether.
3. Lazy asses like Wolfman who always add their reviews for provider X under provider Y will waste the available review space for provider Y.

[chanceforester]

You have clearly thought this through cousin. I think you'r right about the bogus reviews continuing regardless. And as for a free ten days, I think some will do whatever to get it. As far as lazy people who lump providers together, that's just lazy. It doesn't take that long to open up a new provider. the accuracy of the site is most important otherwise it just becomes useless.

[needasianspinner]

Dupree, if I read your comments correctly, I think you misinterpreted the rule. It is a 3 review per provider per monger. So a provider can have a lot of reviews, just not 10 from the same monger.

[southOC]

The only way to ensure accurate reviews is to extend 0 credit. Of course the number of reviews would tumble. Many of the reviews of the popular prostitutes here are bogus. I can write a review of Viet Kim, Angie, May, etc, in five minutes and put just enough twist on it to get it accepted for free credit. This site is still better than any of the others.

[NicetoKnow]

Originally Posted by Chogori

Julie the massage nazi has over 100 and probably 10,000 guys too embarrassed to write a review.

I'm one of the 10,000... (Oh the shame)