#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Great stuff, MPKid. How about a 2 day penalty when you put your review in the wrong geographic area? I see so many OC, San Gabriel and SFV reviews in "Los Angeles" it's irritating as fuck. And I can't select multiple regions using area code search to figure it all out.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I think the key to more NEW reviews (places and providers) is 2 fold. 1. Bonus days for NEW providers and or more bonus days for NEW providers at NEW places. 2. Make it easier to add new providers to existing places. None of us like entering all the same info that already is there....just to add a new provider name to the place so this breeds laziness and you get guys that (I won't mention names since we all know who does this all the time) either post under the wrong name or to get their free days just write another review of the same provider again and again.
More mongers will be more likely to try new providers and review them for the extra days. Currently there is 0 incentive to waste time and money trying to find new talent when for the same 10 days I can write a review for the same girl over and over without even going to see her. THAT in my opinion is the biggest flaw in the system and also the easiest to fix. If they powers that be want a quick fix just give 10 days for NEW (previously never reviewed providers) reviews and 5 days for all others. ANYTHING is better than what we have now! |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I would add that keeping the 10 days might not be a bad idea and making new establishment reviews 15... Look at me spending daddy's money..... ;-) |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
The KISS principle...yes 10 and 15...if adjusted to that we may get snowball leading to avalanche of reviews and wipe the floor clean of the crud....Wholeheartedly Endorse.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Yes my vote is for simple
And a responsive mpr to our reviews and emails Seems like there is no one at the helm any more |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
MPR,
I'm back as VIP. don't disappoint me! |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
How does anyone expect this site to improve drastically if no one is willing to pay for the privilege of being here. It's not like Starbucks is going to pay to advertise. And I realize I'm one of the cheap sucks that never pays. But listening to everyone bitch and moan reminds me of my wife.
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
When i first started here it was more of a good group of mongers who had a nice flow of information. Reviews were more honest and open. The forums had very good info. Somewhere along the way this place changed dramatically. Just go read the OC reviews. Will put you to sleep. Same reviews from different mongers. Nothing new, nothing different, nothing exciting. I know for a fact some of the popular hj girls with abundant boring repetitive reviews are actually quite fun and daring. But every monger is afraid to let the cat out of the bag. And if one does, many monger hearts are broken and those mongers fuck the whole thing up.
the members are this site. And the site is only as good as the members who frequent it and the info they give out. It is no coincidence that many of the great members have left or jyst stopped contributing and now lurk. i have no answers, and am myself a lurker. Less stress, no lines at new shops and hot tail i find. And no stupid internet threats from white nights and pissed providers. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Let's face it. The reviews and General Discussion are really just to get eyeballs and get them to join and become mongers extraordinaire. I don't post a lot of the local stuff anymore because it's all been said and done. I do find new places out of the basin and I provide info on that. The HX girls I see don't want their info out there in the GP, that's why they HX. If they're on backpage, that's a different story it's fair game. I just saw a review from Jenny at Ming in Alhambra. It reminded me I need to pay a visit to that tall drink of water. I'm sure some of you have fucked her. I haven't but I probably wouldn't post to GP if I did, but I would share on the VIP. Hang in there everybody... |
Bookmarks |
|
|