Go Back   Massage Parlor Reviews Forum - MPReviews.com > PUBLIC COMMUNITY > Politics, World Affairs

Politics, World Affairs Change up the chat and talk about important issues of the world

Reply
Thread Tools
  #11  
Unread April 25th, 2019
luvnickeroff luvnickeroff is offline
Junior Puppy
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 0
luvnickeroff is just really niceluvnickeroff is just really niceluvnickeroff is just really niceluvnickeroff is just really nice
Default

The story keeps moving all over the place and so far legally the vids cannot be released. Story heard that somehow vids leaked to internet already. Kraft's attorney's going to have their way with that if true. One storyline has LE using the fact they have footage as a bargaining chip, which already resulted in one failed attempt to get Kraft's lawyers to kneel, do a settlement, based on threat of releasing. There are a lot of bad choices being made and the legal team representing Kraft have a lot of mistakes already done by the prosecution and LE on their side. If the prosecution could ramrod Kraft in the way they have tried, anyone could be affected the same way who is in that type of situation. So this will have a while to play out but it so turns out that Kraft, enjoying a parlor experience, may wind up being a protector of everyone's rights in this scenario, which is not a bad thing, no?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Unread May 21st, 2019
marsean marsean is offline
Shaarang
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,447
Rep Power: 186
marsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Some news broke recently. Unless DA appeals, judge won't admit tapes and vids as evidence. Without that, which was declared obtained illegally on several grounds, there is no case. Further defense legal team working to put lid on any of that getting out anywhere anytime. No reason that won't be final straw for this Florida fiasco. Victory for personal rights for businesses and clients.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Unread May 26th, 2019
Bang Qiu Bang Qiu is offline
VIP User
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: The OC
Posts: 309
Rep Power: 55
Bang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond reputeBang Qiu has a reputation beyond repute
Default

No, victory for extremely rich people...as usual. You think you or me would get the same deal?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Unread May 27th, 2019
marsean marsean is offline
Shaarang
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,447
Rep Power: 186
marsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Bottom line is Yes, with a decent atty, now that a precedent has been set, for conditions that would be similar or the same. For example, the other little guys involved will be able to have the same coverage as Kraft, in basically a class action or even afterward with a decent atty. In future this should be precedent setting and notable since all should be able to recover costs with the case thrown out. What jurisdiction would be so foolish to go after the little people in what amounts to a class action case when the big fish gets it tossed out with evidence not accepted by the court? What jurisdiction would want to have to pay damages and costs for jerking all these people around? People caught up in such sort of case still need legal representation however. A fool would act as his own attorney.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:16 AM.