FOSTA Passes Senate, Making Prostitution Ads a Federal Crime

[Drukpa Kunley]

Nightshift has closed down

TER removed all U.S. escort ads

Cityvibe is gone

Craigslist removed the dating section

Eros is banning some providers using VPN.
they're closing down some accounts.

Google drive is deleting explicit content

Microsoft is changing its terms of service

attached is today’s update for many sites

[Drukpa Kunley]

Nightshift statement is attached or read it here

https://www.nightshift.co

[Drukpa Kunley]

Hours After FOSTA Passed, Reddit Banned 'Escorts' and 'SugarDaddy' Communities

attached is a notice from Reddit

[Drukpa Kunley]

Microsoft bans 'offensive language' and 'inappropriate content' from Skype, Xbox, Office and other services, claiming it has the right to go through your private data to 'investigate.' Skype can record and review your calls. Nudity appearing on Skype calls will get the provider and you banned. The ban hammer could also fall on you if Cortana is listening at the wrong moment or if documents and files hosted on Microsoft services violate Microsoft’s amended terms of service.

Reports of Twitter shadowbanning provider's accounts.

Google Drive has frozen and is locking out provider's access to their videos, images, and files.

[Thrasymedes]

Check out this article on the funding for the war on hobbyists:

https://theintercept.com/2018/03/24/...s-king-county/

The sound of jack boots goose stepping across the U.S. get louder, and louder.

Originally Posted by Drukpa Kunley

from LE officials in news media interviews:

Police and prosecutors have begun to focus on prostitution “hobbyists” and targeting the operators of online review boards.

"Prostitution review websites are a prolific corner of the illicit online sex trade. Websites like the TnA Board and The Erotic Review."

“We are charging people who put the content on the review website with a felony charge of promoting prostitution.”

“Men go on the website, and they post reviews, and they share information. It goes beyond just writing a review. They give their recommendations."

Felony charges against people who are simply posting reviews on a website has never been attempted before in the United States.

"For us, it is part of a philosophy of focusing on the demand side of the prostitution industry, targeting the users instead of the suppliers."

"The main focus for us is on dismantling these website networks of online buyers who are creating this vociferous demand for exploited women."

[marsean]

Originally Posted by Thrasymedes

Check out this article on the funding for the war on hobbyists:

https://theintercept.com/2018/03/24/...s-king-county/

The sound of jack boots goose stepping across the U.S. get louder, and louder.

From the article from the Interecept.com contributed by Thrasymedes:

“The story of how King County prosecutors may have crossed a professional line can be traced back to the fierce determination of one woman: Texas oil heiress Swanee Hunt. The heiress — who still refers to herself as Ambassador Hunt on her personal website, owing to the four years she spent as ambassador to Austria under the Clinton administration — became convinced that the only way to end the sexual exploitation of women and underage youth was to end the demand for prostitution. Under the umbrella of her nonprofit, Hunt Alternatives, which is generously endowed with millions of dollars from Hunt herself and other smaller donors, Hunt established Demand Abolition.”

I wonder if Daddy had his way with Swanee or is she perhaps one of those rare birds who cannot seem to ever experience a Big “O”?

What the heck is the driving force behind her thought process?

Emasculation of men stemming from the way she was treated at a young age? Who knows, who cares?

Just keep in mind all the info pouring out that fills in the “background gap” of this process as we move to the future.


So, a couple of things. For there to be no demand for “exploitation” or “prostitution” means that there will be no sex anymore or that women won’t be allowed to expect to use their assets as a means for any support or source of income?

The first one is not likely as it closes off procreation.

The second goes totally against human nature!

So that would mean, as alternative, legal behavior and legal allowed conduct:

1. that there would be mandatory free sex on demand, ignoring any value assessed to it?

Somehow that seems to devalue personal space, freedom and individual rights and where is the protection for a multitude of personal issues and choices? Or that:

2. that getting married would stop a woman’s ability to bargain for benefits by use of her sex?

I’m all for it but not only would this cause a whole Rethink for Women, but for Men too.

Somehow I do not think this will ever happen, regardless of the persistence of Swanee Hunt.

Somehow I do not think that is what Swanee Hunt had in mind when she got behind her movement.

Maybe however, her movement was also behind this action that congress has taken?


From erstwhile sexpert Drukpa Kunley:

“Felony charges against people who are simply posting reviews on a website has never been attempted before in the United States.” Thank goodness for small favors.


It’s good to think these things through and get more comments.