Go Back   Massage Parlor Reviews Forum - MPReviews.com > PUBLIC COMMUNITY > Politics, World Affairs

Politics, World Affairs Change up the chat and talk about important issues of the world

Reply
Thread Tools
  #1  
Unread October 12th, 2011
im390415 im390415 is offline
VIP User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
im390415
Default Oral Sex May Cause More Throat Cancer Than Smoking in Men, Researchers Say

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-1...men-study.html

A virus spread by oral sex may cause more cases of throat cancer in men than smoking, a finding that spurred calls for a new large-scale test of a drug used against the infection.

Researchers examined 271 throat-tumor samples collected over 20 years ending in 2004 and found that the percentage of oral cancer linked to the human papillomavirus, or HPV, surged to 72 percent from about 16 percent, according to a report released yesterday in the Journal of Clinical Oncology. By 2020, the virus-linked throat tumors -- which mostly affected men -- will become more common than HPV-caused cervical cancer, the report found.
HPV is known for infecting genitals. The finding that it can spread to the throat and cause cancer may increase pressure on Merck & Co., the second-largest U.S. drugmaker, to conduct large-scale trials to see if its vaccine Gardasil, which wards off cervical cancer in women, also prevents HPV throat infections.

“The burden of cancer caused by HPV is going to shift from women to men in this decade,” Maura Gillison, an oncologist at Ohio State University and study senior author, said in a telephone interview. “What we believe is happening is that the number of sexual partners and exposure to HPV has risen over that same time period.”

Gillison said she worked with researchers at Whitehouse Station, New Jersey-based Merck several years ago to design a study in men. After Merck acquired Schering-Plough Corp. in 2009, though, the trial “was canceled,” she said.

No Further Study

Pamela Eisele, a spokeswoman for Merck, said the company decided not to move ahead with a big oral cancer study “due to competing research and business priorities.” GlaxoSmithKline Plc (GSK) has “no plans” to study the company’s competing vaccine Cervarix outside of cervical cancer, Jennifer Armstrong, a company spokeswoman, said in an e-mail.

Gardasil is approved for preventing cervical, vaginal and anal cancers and genital warts, and is recommended for girls and women ages 9 through 26. It is also approved for preventing genital warts and anal cancer in boys and young men of the same ages. Glaxo’s Cervarix is approved for preventing cervical cancer in females ages 9 through 25.

Both vaccines target the HPV strain linked to oral cancer, Gillison said.
HPV-linked throat cancers, or orophyaryngeal cancer, are increasing so rapidly that by 2020 there will be 8,700 U.S. cases, with 7,400 cases in men, versus 7,700 cases of cervical cancer, the study said. Male cases alone will outnumber cervical cancer cases soon after 2020, Gillison said. The Ohio State study is based on tumor samples from several U.S. states.

HPV Infections

Roughly 20 million Americans have genital HPV infections, according to the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. At least half of sexually active women and men get it at some point in their lives, the CDC says. Most of the time it doesn’t cause health problems.

Until recently, head and neck cancer mainly occurred in older patients and was associated with tobacco and alcohol use. The HPV-linked head and neck cancers, usually of the tonsils, palate or tongue, hit men their 30s, 40s, and 50s, Gillison said. It is unclear why women are affected much less often than men, she said.

The decline in HPV-negative oral cancers mirrors the decline of smoking in the U.S., the study said.

Treatment involving chemotherapy, radiation and sometimes surgery, “is very nasty,” said Gillison. “It can leave people with permanent physical disfigurement, difficulty with speech and swallowing and poor dental health.”

Research Effort

Gillison started researching the oral cancer epidemic more than a decade ago as a fellow at Johns Hopkins University. Another researcher told her about a report from Europe of a case of oral cancer that was HPV positive, she said.
“I started working on it immediately,” she said.

In a 2007 epidemiology study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, Gillison and her colleagues found that having a high number of oral or vaginal sex partners are risk factors for HPV-associated throat cancer. The cancer may also be spread by open-mouth kissing, Gillison said in the interview.

“Nobody paid attention to oral HPV infections until 2007,” she said. “We are about 15 years behind in the research” compared with the data on cervical cancer and HPV, she said.

An editorial accompanying the study concluded that trials to see whether vaccines prevent oral cancer “are needed, given that prevention through vaccination will almost certainly be the ultimate solution” to HPV-positive oral cancers.

A key step would be to perform a natural history study that would follow people over a number of years and track in more detail how HPV-oral infections lead to cancer. This could help inform how to design a vaccine trial, Gillison said.

Both vaccines target the HPV strain linked to oral cancer, Gillison said.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Unread January 31st, 2012
trooth trooth is offline
Senior Dog
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: .
Posts: 790
Rep Power: 14
trooth is on a distinguished road
Default

This is pretty sobering.

When will the vaccine be available?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Unread February 22nd, 2013
mattprior1201 mattprior1201 is offline
Junior Puppy
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
mattprior1201 is infamous around these parts
Default Oral Sex May Cause More Throat Cancer Than Smoking in Men, Researchers Say

Oral sex is not as safe as many have assumed it to be. Recent research findings by university scientists in South Africa, Britain and the United States show that it is one of the leading causes of oro-pharyngeal cancer, which occurs in the mouth area.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Unread February 26th, 2013
traveler26 traveler26 is offline
VIP User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 184
Rep Power: 28
traveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant futuretraveler26 has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trooth View Post
This is pretty sobering.

When will the vaccine be available?
They already have HPV vaccines. It's been a recent thing for pushing men to take the vaccine now instead of it being mainly targeted for women.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Unread February 28th, 2013
Sore_Loin Sore_Loin is offline
VIP User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: .
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 18
Sore_Loin is on a distinguished road
Default

It is scary, but I wonder if there are other studies, which do not draw the same conclusions about modes of transmission. Seems like females would be as susceptible as males since there is so much transfer: dick goes in pussy, dick goes in mouth, mouth kisses pussy kisses mouth.

Her study was partially funded by Merck, maker of the vaccine.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Unread March 4th, 2013
needasianspinner needasianspinner is offline
Senior Dog
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: .
Posts: 449
Rep Power: 28
needasianspinner is a splendid one to beholdneedasianspinner is a splendid one to beholdneedasianspinner is a splendid one to beholdneedasianspinner is a splendid one to beholdneedasianspinner is a splendid one to beholdneedasianspinner is a splendid one to beholdneedasianspinner is a splendid one to beholdneedasianspinner is a splendid one to behold
Default

I have always been shocked at how many guys on MPR state that they will go down on the girls at the AMPs or hotels. Any high mileage girl must be high risk. You wear a condom to protect junior, but you aren't worried about protecting your face and mouth?
Plus you never know if she did BBFS with the prior customer. Maybe I just am not hardcore.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Unread March 5th, 2013
Sore_Loin Sore_Loin is offline
VIP User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: .
Posts: 129
Rep Power: 18
Sore_Loin is on a distinguished road
Default

Conversely, I am surprised by the guys who like to be rimmed and get a bbbj, or who do bbfs but are vehemently against daty for health reasons!

I am not suggesting indescriminate daty with skanky providers. Generally, I do it with girls who have access to shower or bathe/doche between customers. It must pass a visual and smell test. But if it smells good and is clean, I find oral activity with a beautiful woman as satisfying as fucking.

I'd wager a fair proportion of daty denouncers (even on the most clean girls), are fairly conservative food-wise, not fans of funky foods/exotic bizarre tastes, such as urchin, or foods with a high lactobacilli zing - true muenster... or other fermented foods (which oddly may confer some sort of extra immunity)...

The human mouth has evolved many defense mechanisms, saliva being one, that are anti-microbial, anti-bacterial. Think of all the bacteria and germs that normally get into your mouth. Its probably denial, but I am hoping the jury is still out on the HPV thing. It is not the act of daty itself that is dangerous, it is not knowing who has it. It's an essential good habit to spit, pee, rinse and wash thoroughly immediately after any contact with providers. This has been proven to make a huge difference, but from what I gather a lot guys just get a wipe down and split.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Unread March 8th, 2013
sua gua sua gua is offline
VIP User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: .
Posts: 803
Rep Power: 19
sua gua is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sore_Loin View Post
It is scary, but I wonder if there are other studies, which do not draw the same conclusions about modes of transmission. Seems like females would be as susceptible as males since there is so much transfer: dick goes in pussy, dick goes in mouth, mouth kisses pussy kisses mouth.

Her study was partially funded by Merck, maker of the vaccine.
Bingo.
Any medical study of any kind, we the people should look at who paid for it. Especially the ones that say that this natural product doesnt work, or that natural product doesnt work. BULLSHIT!

If we could, and can cure ourselves of anything that there is a "DRUG" made for, there really wouldnt be as much use for the Big Pharma drug makers, and the doctors who push this poison on all of us as they go on their Big Pahrma sponsored vacations because the Docs push drugs all the time into us, the unknowing stupid ignorant public.

Some one go ahead and argue this with me! I can give you example after example of the things I went thru for some of the deadliest things a human can go thru, and I am still here and dont take ONE Pharma drug.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:14 AM.