hookers texting me

[Richard Boinkwell]

Originally Posted by mikesan1

Yes.
But nothing compared to this new Viet chick I scored outside of the business.
90 lbs, gorgeous and a body like a junior high school chick.
Nice score after losing my fk buddy recently.

Way to stay on topic. We love hearing about your great conquests--please ask admin to set up a section specifically for that.

[Drukpa Kunley]

18 U.S.C. § 2421A. Section 3


18 U.S.C. § 1595(d)


18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)


18 U.S.C. § 1591(e)(4)


47 U.S.C. § 230

[deezguy]

Going over phone, email and other histories seem to be the preferred alternative to hitting the streets.

[Drukpa Kunley]

hookers texting me

A girl I saw a couple of times texted me last night begging me to come save her. she is finding it hard to get johns. She even sent me a great video of her doing a Youporn quality bj and swallow. Another girl keeps texting me letting me know where she is this day, and I never even met her, just discussed meeting. Are you guys with a longer provider rolodex experiencing the same thing?

its been tough since most of the sites down. How about sharing this one. got her number.

Damn straight, about time the johns get a little respect and better service for their dollars. the law of supply and demand is back in buyers mode.

It’s sounds like a market adjustment, so we should be able to have lower prices

"whoever owns, manages, or operates an interactive computer service, or who attempts to do so, with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person shall be fined, imprisoned for up to 10 years or both."

18 U.S.C. § 2421A Section 3

[TommyZ]

Originally Posted by Drukpa Kunley

hookers texting me

"whoever owns, manages, or operates an interactive computer service, or who attempts to do so, with the intent to promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person shall be fined, imprisoned for up to 10 years or both."

18 U.S.C. § 2421A Section 3

You should know.

Our friend Libertine here is the pimp behind "Botox Katey" at http://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/BeautifulAsians

... among lots of other mischief.

The real reason he posts this incessant stream of shit is because he has skin in the game.

Queue Fat Mars.

[mikesan1]

None of us own, operates or manages but thanks for pissing in the pool.

[Drukpa Kunley]

47 U.S.C. § 230 makes the amendment to Section 230 retroactive, stating that the amendment “shall apply regardless of whether the conduct occurred … before, on, or after” the date of enactment.

[Inspector_Lee]

Originally Posted by Drukpa Kunley

47 U.S.C. § 230 makes the amendment to Section 230 retroactive, stating that the amendment “shall apply regardless of whether the conduct occurred … before, on, or after” the date of enactment.

Funny, I didn't notice that part when I looked it up.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Your "quote" appears to suggest an ex post facto law, which by definition is unconstitutional. Please be more specific as to where in the code your quote is to be found.

[Drukpa Kunley]

reading U.S. Codes that haven't been updated and were posted a long time ago on the internet, before the codes and sections have been amended by Congress in 2018, is a meaningless exercise if one wants to understand their current application to the law.

47 U.S.C.; the Communications Act of 1934 and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, have been amended




FOSTA § 4(a) codified at 47 U.S.C. § 230. FOSTA makes the amendment to Section 230 retroactive. FOSTA § 4(b)

alleged conduct is retroactive, it shall apply whether the conduct occurred before, on, or after, the date of enactment of the amendment



for those of you that dream in your sleep of fighting the U.S. government in federal court on unconstitutional prosecution of federal statutes used against you, first pay your cash bond using the equity in your home and withdraw your life's savings from the bank to get yourself out on bail, go win the powerball lottery, then retain a team of great criminal defense attorneys, and check back with us in 8 years after you have appealed your case up to the Ninth Circuit Court and be sure to let us know how bankrupt and old you are now

[Inspector_Lee]

Found it. You're right.

"SEC. 4. Ensuring ability to enforce federal and state criminal and civil law relating to sex trafficking.

(a) In General.—Section 230(e) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

“(5) NO EFFECT ON SEX TRAFFICKING LAW.—Nothing in this section (other than subsection (c)(2)(A)) shall be construed to impair or limit—

“(A) any claim in a civil action brought under section 1595 of title 18, United States Code, if the conduct underlying the claim constitutes a violation of section 1591 of that title;

“(B) any charge in a criminal prosecution brought under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 1591 of title 18, United States Code; or

“(C) any charge in a criminal prosecution brought under State law if the conduct underlying the charge would constitute a violation of section 2421A of title 18, United States Code, and promotion or facilitation of prostitution is illegal in the jurisdiction where the defendant’s promotion or facilitation of prostitution was targeted.”.

(b) Effective date.—The amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and the amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply regardless of whether the conduct alleged occurred, or is alleged to have occurred, before, on, or after such date of enactment."

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-...bill/1865/text