|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Last edited by Drukpa Kunley; May 5th, 2022 at 08:25 PM. 
|
|
#12
March 28th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
If they remove the ability for it to be written about does not the whole issue go underground where there is no protection for those involved?
More beat up providers more theft because you know they cannot track stuff that doesn't exist, right? WTH?
|
|
#13
March 28th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK so War on all adult related publications or related businesses because of somebody's interpretation of what?
We thought this was ironed out clearly way way back, no? Now they pick an area they can attack? Now I now have to be very careful about what I say not to be labeled an alarmist, a gypsy, an oddball, some political designator(which starts it's own hullabaloo), a crazy sex maniac, a walking dead freak, a Martian or other alien,or (Heavens) a hobbyist or amp monger looking for my pound of flesh. So I'll just say it this way: Whatever happened to SPEEDOM of FREECH? Looks like it is on it's way out? Granted nobody expects you to stand up on a soap box but don't you think your voice can still be heard voicing your concerns on this topic and it's related future effect on individual freedoms and safety of those who are affected no matter what quarter they are in or from? Just a question. If you have the time to spin a yarn or drop off your thoughts. Is it worth it to you? Even for review boards to go down or rags to disappear online, or even published, or even those we used to get either free or for a few quarters in the vending boxes. Next think no print newspapers or magazines with salacious semi nudie pics or bra ads or even Mondo Kane ads, or Nat Geo with be banned. WTH? Last edited by marsean; March 28th, 2018 at 11:33 PM.
|
|
#14
March 28th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Eff me they are still hunting for shit to shut, and that will be soon to follow!
|
|
#15
March 28th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And how do you find out their sc names in the first place, since you need to know that to send a chat, right? I'm speaking of new contacts here, not someone you knew from another platform and got their sc names from there.
|
|
#16
March 28th, 2018
|
||||
|
||||
|
what did happen to the First Amendment ?
........let's ask the Grand OLD Party (GOP) from the 2016 Republican Party Presidential Platform: "The internet must not become a safe haven for predators." "Pornography, with its harmful effects, has become a public health crisis that is destroying the life of millions. We encourage states to continue to fight this public menace." so, terrorists and mass murderers using the internet is ok, but the internet being used by sex workers and for porn should never be permitted
|
|
#17
March 28th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://www.newsweek.com/backpage-sex...-harris-531187 She also supports, along with Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California), the SESTA/FOSTA monstrosity that is now attempting to suck Freedom of Speech out of the Internet. https://www.harris.senate.gov/news/press-releases https://twitter.com/SenFeinstein/sta...35665805467648 BTW, I recently wrote to both of these fine ladies urging them to oppose SESTA/FOSTA. While we may not want to out ourselves as mongers in public, we can at least contact our legislators and express our opposition to these heavy-handed measures and let them know that some voters are paying attention.
|
|
#18
March 28th, 2018
|
||||
|
||||
|
SESTA-FOSTA passed the Senate 97-2. only Ron Wyden (D) and Rand Paul (R) voted no
(not fake news) - FACT: a Republican president signed SESTA-FOSTA into law the GOP and the current leader of their political party (the president) continue to advance numerous retro social policies because they are totally owned and controlled by evangelical fundamentalist bible thumping born again christian voters who put Gorsuch on the Supremes ? FACT: the written and stated position of the Republican Party - "Pornography is a public health crisis and a public menace." if you joined the 1950's ride along with those praise the lord relics, you own it
|
|
#19
March 28th, 2018
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I assume you are from California like me, and that Harris and Feinstein are your senators. They voted for SESTA. It ain't my fault they're Democrats. Tell me, did you write to them to express your concerns? As for me, I rode the Hillary trainwreck in the last election, but only out of fear of who we now have in the White House. We all "own it." Or rather, "it" owns us.
|
|
#20
March 28th, 2018
|
||||
|
||||
|
as already posted above, there's no disputing who supported FOSTA-SESTA: all D's, except one, voted yes and all R's, except one, voted yes. and the one R no vote, who claims to be a Libertarian, is really not a true Libertarian and neither is his father
a member, supporting the majority in power in D.C., asked; whatever happened to freedom of speech ? the FACTS are: there's only 'one' political party in this country that's joined at the hip with evangelical fundamentalist bible thumping born again christian voters FACT: it was evangelical fundamentalist bible thumping born again christian organizations that were the driving force behind the writing of the FOSTA-SESTA bills and then getting them passed through Congress without evangelical fundamentalist bible thumping born again christians pushing their religious agenda, with the assistance of their political party of choice now in control of Congress, this law, that decimates CDA Section 230, may have evolved much differently or maybe not even at all those are FACTS the Church is running the State (all three branches of U.S. government)
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
