Thread: Robert craft
View Single Post
  #14  
Unread May 27th, 2019
marsean marsean is offline
Shaarang
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,447
Rep Power: 186
marsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond reputemarsean has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Bottom line is Yes, with a decent atty, now that a precedent has been set, for conditions that would be similar or the same. For example, the other little guys involved will be able to have the same coverage as Kraft, in basically a class action or even afterward with a decent atty. In future this should be precedent setting and notable since all should be able to recover costs with the case thrown out. What jurisdiction would be so foolish to go after the little people in what amounts to a class action case when the big fish gets it tossed out with evidence not accepted by the court? What jurisdiction would want to have to pay damages and costs for jerking all these people around? People caught up in such sort of case still need legal representation however. A fool would act as his own attorney.
Reply With Quote