[deezguy]

It’s bad enough when somebody submits a review using one provider’s name and it’s actually a review of another provider. The recent could be the provider that they originally wanted was not available so they got a new girl. Maybe they’re too lazy to put in all the information for this new provider. Using a previously reason provider allows them to ninth means they don’t need to come up with provided personal information. Could this be laziness?
Now we have a review where the monger uses a shop that has been renamed with an owner change and the name of a provider who is probably no longer in the biz. Using the old shops name with the same address and a phone number that no longer works the submitter to doesn’t have to fill in all that information. The submitter also uses the name of a provider is no longer there. Finally, in his description, he talks about the shops name change and the provider that gave him service. Come on dudes, don’t be lazy! If you need to write info for a new shop name, phone number or address, do so if you run across a new provider don’t use an old providers bio to submit your review.