|
|||||||
| Massage 411 Massage Info, Therapeutic Massage |
Topic Review (Newest First)
|
| February 5th, 2014 01:46 PM | ||
| chanceforester |
Quote:
I was on another site erotic for a long time before it went dead and it was only a picture of the parlor that would get you credit. I did a few on that site just for fun. The stair shot on the place on Palizada in San Clemente. Another was SJC I think Mint? I also did EZRelax in Westminster. I also did Mr p for a while,which is basically free, but that site is hard to navigate IMHO. I agree with TJ in that this is a good site and I guess there would be less reviews, at least for a while, but at least maybe they'd be for the most part real. I did Naughty and Rub for a while, but Rub just seemed goofy. They do seem to be taking off again tho...I go on and just take a peek every now and again. |
|
| February 5th, 2014 11:55 AM | ||
| NicetoKnow |
Quote:
|
|
| February 5th, 2014 11:45 AM | ||
| NicetoKnow |
Quote:
|
|
| February 5th, 2014 10:00 AM | ||
| southOC | The only way to ensure accurate reviews is to extend 0 credit. Of course the number of reviews would tumble. Many of the reviews of the popular prostitutes here are bogus. I can write a review of Viet Kim, Angie, May, etc, in five minutes and put just enough twist on it to get it accepted for free credit. This site is still better than any of the others. | |
| February 4th, 2014 12:57 PM | ||
| needasianspinner | Dupree, if I read your comments correctly, I think you misinterpreted the rule. It is a 3 review per provider per monger. So a provider can have a lot of reviews, just not 10 from the same monger. | |
| February 2nd, 2014 10:16 AM | ||
| chanceforester | You have clearly thought this through cousin. I think you'r right about the bogus reviews continuing regardless. And as for a free ten days, I think some will do whatever to get it. As far as lazy people who lump providers together, that's just lazy. It doesn't take that long to open up a new provider. the accuracy of the site is most important otherwise it just becomes useless. | |
| February 2nd, 2014 06:45 AM | ||
| dupree |
Quote:
But this will cause the three following problems, all worse in my opinion: 1. The guys who write BS reviews will simply write them for girls who have less than 3 reviews, meaning a larger sample set of that girl's info will be useless. 2. Guys will simply fabricate girls altogether. 3. Lazy asses like Wolfman who always add their reviews for provider X under provider Y will waste the available review space for provider Y. |
|
| February 1st, 2014 08:23 PM | ||
| chanceforester |
Quote:
It's only ten days per review, but I've seen some BS reviews (as we all have), especially for providers that are long gone from that shop...that's just lame. I know money is tight, but I think there are some that take advantage of it. It is a business after all, and we are lucky to have a cool site like this. I started out nearly ten years ago with ********. It was good for a long time, but just went flat. I'm not sure why. That's when I came here. The good thing is that fellow mongers call BS on fake or ridiculously repetitive reviews....never mind the "I butt fucked her" threads! |
|
| February 1st, 2014 12:59 PM | ||
| dupree |
Explain to me again why we want to have a limit of three reviews per provider? I still contend it's a bad idea. |
|
| January 30th, 2014 11:15 AM | ||
| Lector | Betty? She's a gem! | |
| This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. | ||
