Quote:
Originally Posted by MPReviews
Hi Deezguy,
To try to answer your question, the profile details, which are listed above all reviews, are typically updated based upon the most current reviewers submission. Sometimes, if a provider is already in our database, a reviewer will leave some of the pre-populated fields as is, which is why the review might not always match the checked off categories. There is also reviewer error e.g they meant to click on legit but selected the service field right below it by mistake.
The profile details give a general idea of what services are provided and therefore won't be 100% accurate 100% of the time. Please use the contact link and provide us with a name and phone number and the discrepancy if something is way off. The member reviews are there to give an even more detailed account, so as a rule of thumb choose written review descriptions over the provider detail boxes.
|
I was concerned with individual reviewer submissions. I realize profile details may change with time.
I read a recent review. In services, it listed FS as yes. In the comment section, the reviewer mentioned that she did provide FS but he was not interested and tipped for one of her other services. Apparently in services, he attempted to us know that FS is available but in the comment section, he declined.
So, my question is should the service be checked yes because it's available or no because the service was not received. My thinking is it should be "no" because the service did not take place. Marking the service "yes" because it is available would make the actual tip given incongruous with the service listed (e.g. $50 tip and FS checked as yes).
Yes, it is best that you choose written review descriptions over the provider detail boxes but there have been some descriptions that have no mention of services listed. I guess caveat emptor.