"Didn't get her name..."
 

Just wondering if a review without name of the provider qualifies for 10 days free VIP? So who do we ask for or avoid? Read one such review posted today and wondered if there's some value in it I am missing? ....

You might be OK...But you really better have a good description with details of what she looked like and her personality. Later, someone may ID her, and ADMIN can change the NAME from "unknown."

There's little or no value in roughly a third of the reviews that are accepted.

I don't agree. I think Admin should reject approving new reviews posted without a providers name. That will do two things:

1. Help to keep the quality and integrity of this site's reviews with each provider named.

2. Admin doesn't have enough time to go back in the past and add girl's names to unnamed reviews that somehow were accepted and they would be guessing anyway.

Or the reviewer just puts a BS name on it.

Shit happens. Point is any member using the site going to an unknown location can at least ask for the girl's name for whatever was reviewed. If name was bogus and made up you would find out soon enough. Once a provider has a list of reviews you can pretty much count on the name being used there and if the description matching the name, then if she is available, you may be in luck, for what you are looking for.

Common practice at most parlors is to assign a name to providers when they start and some even have more than one name, or even a different name at a different spa. So, for the most part, girls names at spas or parlors are assigned. At least the "name" is usually consistent when they are known by a number of clients. How many times have you run into the situation where a girl is using her own name? You get some consistency if they stay at the same parlor for a long time, usually.

In the case of escorts, we all know that they use many different names. A very fluid scenario, and constantly move where they work, generally, as well.

So back to your point if a guy puts down a BS name, you will find out soon enough they have no one by that name there, and this reflects back on the reviewer who used the BS name.

This has been what I've found, but maybe others have a different take.

My original intent was input on the value of a review with no name of the provider, for whatever reason. I wouldn't post a review without a name as I think that is a waste of space. "Forgot to ask" is a really lame excuse...I would backtrack; maybe call mms and explain you would like to request the same girl next time but couldn't remember the name. Word it in a way that doesn't sound probing or stalking....at least make an effort to learn the name. You are not going to read Consumer Reports for a review on a new DSLR camera; "Sorry we forgot the Manufacturer's name but here's the full review...."

If you know you are going to review a provider, calling back and getting the name, (under a false pretense) wouldn't be a bad idea. Getting a name is preferred.

Don't do it. IMHO, there is little value posting such a review. But the same can be said for reviews made for a provider under another provider's name or the countless redundant reviews by some for the same provider with little new info. All these reviews are submitted in the quest for 10 free days.

If she' good, go back and see her again and get her name then submit a review. If she's not good, then we really don't care. Do we?

Yeah, we do care. We need to know who to avoid as well.